Geometer moths (Geometridae)
Announcements
15 Apr 2025
Dear NatureMapr Moderator Community,We’re excited to share a new feature aimed at saving you time when providing constructive feedback to contributors.You’ll now see "Moderator Quick Response" buttons...
Continue reading
New priority species lists in the ACT
NatureMapr now receives more records in NSW than ACT
NatureMapr Data Collector 6.2.1 update
Critical nature positive infrastructure update
Discussion
ibaird
wrote:
6 hrs ago
Hi Glenn, I've suggested renaming this record to Furcatrox (genus) to remove the redundancy with 'Furcatrox sp. "and all the other Furcatrox (genus) sightings on NatireMapr. However, the photo seems to be missing. Please supply it if yu have it or delete the record as you see fit. I suspect the record may also be there on the ALA already anyway?
Furcatrox (genus)
ibaird
wrote:
6 hrs ago
Hi @GlennCocking, thanks for your sighting. The media you provided is missing or unclear. To help us verify this sighting, please provide additional media.
Furcatrox (genus)
donhe
wrote:
12 hrs ago
I think that right hindwing looks like E. bispinaria, and left hindwing like E. excursaria.
Ectropis (genus)
ibaird
wrote:
Yesterday
Yes, but they also show a photo of the species (see page: 'Chlorocoma assimilis (TP.Lucas, 1888) group'3/3) which looks very close to this moth without any red on it at all. In the key for the group 'Yellow on fringe.' they say for the similar species C. melacrossa.'No red on costa' but they don.t rule our red on C assimilis in other photos of the species on pp, 2/1/qnd 2/2. But neither C. carenaria nor C. melacrossa have plain green wings.
Chlorocoma assimilis
Top contributors
- kasiaaus 1.1K
- jb2602 995
- PJH123 550
- WendyEM 521
- AlisonMilton 484
- JohnBundock 376
- SteveBorkowskis 320
- ConBoekel 315
- ibaird 312
- Bron 257
Top moderators
- donhe 4K
- ibaird 3.5K
- GlennCocking 809
- DianneClarke 313
- WendyEM 146
- MichaelMulvaney 80
- JulieMorgan 57
- MichaelBedingfield 20
- kasiaaus 20
- KimPullen 18
